The group you are posting to is a
Usenet group . Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking, sci.med.nutrition, misc.health.alternative
From:
Anonymous <cri... @ecn.org> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:05:47 +0200 (CEST)
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 12:05 pm
Subject: Butter is better
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From:
"Edwin Pawlowski" <e... @snet.net> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:08:48 -0400
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 1:08 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From:
"Zeppo_m" <zepp... @hotmail.org> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:04:48 -0400
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 2:04 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
My cardiologist would tend to disagree.
Jon
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From:
"cybercat" <cyberpu... @yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:03:37 -0400
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 2:03 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From:
Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwri... @gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:11:01 GMT
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 2:11 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
On Wed 27 Aug 2008 08:04:48p, Zeppo_m told us...
My cardiologist said cook with olive oil, but enjoy a modicum of butter.
He's not a fan of margarines. Having said that, I do use a Canola and
flaxseed oil margarine that has 0 transfats, no cholesterol, and is not
hydrogenated. That seems pretty safe.
--
*******************************************
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From:
"Ms P" <ms_peac... @wbsnet.org> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:51:58 -0500
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 2:51 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
"Zeppo_m" <zepp
... @hotmail.org> wrote in message
news:6hmip5FmqoduU1@mid.individual.net ...
Your cardiologist probably took a one hour course on nutrition. Most
current diet "wisdom" is based on 50s and 60s research.
Ms P
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From:
"cybercat" <cyberpu... @yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:28:34 -0400
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 4:28 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
"Ms P" <ms_peac... @wbsnet.org> wrote
> Your cardiologist probably took a one hour course on nutrition. Most
Nothing has changed about saturated fat. It's a killer, particularly for
sedentary people, and most of us are sedentary. Even eggs, which are very
high in cholesterol, are not in and of themselves bad for you, but the
cheese and bacon and butter we have with them that clogs arteries.
Butter is *not* good for you. Doing without altogether and just using
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: sf
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:56:32 -0700
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 5:56 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:28:34 -0400, "cybercat" <cyberpu
... @yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Butter is *not* good for you.
Putting hands over ears.
>Doing without altogether and just using
What would you suggest as a beginner for butter lovers?
--
Mae West
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From:
TFM® <hillbilly... @tampabay.rr.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:30:23 -0400
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 6:30 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
"sf" wrote in message
news:9uicb4dfmt45b5hph4285thb834e27t6jc@4ax.com ...
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:28:34 -0400, "cybercat" <cyberpu
... @yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>>Butter is *not* good for you.
> Putting hands over ears.
>>Doing without altogether and just using
> What would you suggest as a beginner for butter lovers?
I suggest they put their hands over their eyes when cybercat posts.
I think I'll eat a stick of butter and a pound of cheese now.
TFM®
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From:
"Edwin Pawlowski" <e... @snet.net> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:10:51 -0400
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 9:10 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
"Zeppo_m" <zepp
... @hotmail.org> wrote in message
news:6hmip5FmqoduU1@mid.individual.net ...
My wife's agrees. Butter in moderation over partially hydrogenated oils.
Perhaps you need an enlightened cardiologist.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking, sci.med.nutrition, misc.health.alternative
From:
"Juhana Harju" <n... @mail.fi> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:39:31 +0300
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 10:39 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
Contrary to what is written there, butter is not a notable source of vitamin
K2. Good sources of vitamin K2 are some cheeses (Dutch Edam and Gouda),
chicken, turkey, and especially the Japanese fermented soyfood /natto/.
--
"Aliquando insanire iucundum est."
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: Billy <Hereiam@hotmaildotcom>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:50:50 -0400
Local: Thurs, Aug 28 2008 10:50 pm
Subject: Re: Butter is better
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:39:31 +0300, "Juhana Harju" <n
... @mail.fi>
wrote:
>Contrary to what is written there,
Butter is good Butter is bad Coffee is good
Coffee is bad Wine is good Wine is bad....
What's new with this study is that next week, another sterling
Life is meant for moderation in everything and a healthy lifestyle is
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: "Ms P" <ms_peac
