<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision</id>
  <title type="text">sci.med.vision Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Human vision, visual correction, and visual science.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.med.vision/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.med.vision feed"/>
  <updated>2008-11-21T07:06:31Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.sb" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>anand</name>
  <email>anand.anand...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-21T07:06:31Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/5ab15900034d68e4/b7feb9f5d4f33905?show_docid=b7feb9f5d4f33905</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/5ab15900034d68e4/b7feb9f5d4f33905?show_docid=b7feb9f5d4f33905"/>
  <title type="text">capacitor</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  A capacitor is an electrical/electronic device that can store energy &lt;br&gt; in the electric field between a pair of conductors (called &amp;quot;plates&amp;quot;). &lt;br&gt; The process of storing energy in the capacitor is known as &amp;quot;charging&amp;quot;, &lt;br&gt; and involves electric charges of equal magnitude, but opposite &lt;br&gt; polarity, building up on each plate.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Glenn Hagele - USAEyes. org</name>
  <email>glenn.hagelestops...@usaeyes.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T21:44:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/b02f2500f062d0e8/57030ee7b002c1c1?show_docid=57030ee7b002c1c1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/b02f2500f062d0e8/57030ee7b002c1c1?show_docid=57030ee7b002c1c1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: LASIK eye surgery</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  For the vast majority of Lasik patients, vision recovery is a day or &lt;br&gt; two. The healing, however, takes longer and during the three to six &lt;br&gt; months after surgery a patient may experience fluctuating vision, &lt;br&gt; minor halos around light sources at night, dry eye, and other maladies &lt;br&gt; that can range from a very minor nuisance to a major problem.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jennifer Hopkins</name>
  <email>justjen...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T19:53:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/b02f2500f062d0e8/1dc110eab341d68d?show_docid=1dc110eab341d68d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/b02f2500f062d0e8/1dc110eab341d68d?show_docid=1dc110eab341d68d"/>
  <title type="text">LASIK eye surgery</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I had a question about LASIK laser eye surgery. What is the revocery time, if any, for the procedure? &lt;br&gt; Thanks
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>ironjustice@aol.com</name>
  <email>ironjust...@aol.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T15:22:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/53b422ab134a0326/479908c9bf5ca274?show_docid=479908c9bf5ca274</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/53b422ab134a0326/479908c9bf5ca274?show_docid=479908c9bf5ca274"/>
  <title type="text">Oxidative Stress In Glaucoma</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;Oxidative stress is a factor in glaucoma&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Will Glaucoma Be The First Neurodegenerative Disease To Be Cured? &lt;br&gt; Article Date: 19 Nov 2008 - 2:00 PST &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;More than in any preceding year,&amp;quot; says Glaucoma Research Foundation &lt;br&gt; (GRF) President and CEO Thomas M. Brunner, &amp;quot;there is a heightened &lt;br&gt; sense of anticipation around the annual Research Overview by the four
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mike Tyner</name>
  <email>mty...@mindspring.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T15:21:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/6229ca5e1c89d95b?show_docid=6229ca5e1c89d95b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/6229ca5e1c89d95b?show_docid=6229ca5e1c89d95b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Just had cataract surgery - original problem seems worse</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;roberu...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; OTOH, people choose to have LASIK electively. Complication rates are pretty &lt;br&gt; similar between the two procedures and there are arguments for using &lt;br&gt; cataract surgery as a treatment for refractive error. &lt;br&gt; On cataract surgery the best advice used to be &amp;quot;you need surgery when you
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Neil Brooks</name>
  <email>neil0...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T15:20:00Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/817f7b618ba42e08?show_docid=817f7b618ba42e08</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/817f7b618ba42e08?show_docid=817f7b618ba42e08"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Just had cataract surgery - original problem seems worse</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Not too often, Dear Boy, or you&#39;ll go blind! &lt;br&gt; Best guess? The voices, in your head.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mike Tyner</name>
  <email>mty...@mindspring.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T15:14:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/4e18d91b026be5f5/89303de8bea2d04e?show_docid=89303de8bea2d04e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/4e18d91b026be5f5/89303de8bea2d04e?show_docid=89303de8bea2d04e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: secondary cataract 4 years after</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Of course preferences vary, but -1.50 is most logical for many. &lt;br&gt; If you haven&#39;t had surgery on the other eye, there&#39;ll be a second chance. &lt;br&gt; -MT
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>MindfulMan</name>
  <email>parker.michaelspar...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-18T23:30:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/6cb7760ce0f77a2a/ed249ad9a14f64fa?show_docid=ed249ad9a14f64fa</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/6cb7760ce0f77a2a/ed249ad9a14f64fa?show_docid=ed249ad9a14f64fa"/>
  <title type="text">Money Making Opportunity</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello! Do you want to own your own business? Do you want a chance to &lt;br&gt; have an unlimited income stream while others bring customers to your &lt;br&gt; business for you? Well, you are in luck, because that is exactly what &lt;br&gt; this is: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.lwsfreedom.com/id/greentitan&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>roberu...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-18T22:13:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/7aa78dfe55731a00?show_docid=7aa78dfe55731a00</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/7aa78dfe55731a00?show_docid=7aa78dfe55731a00"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Just had cataract surgery - original problem seems worse</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks for the advice. I hope you are right. I do think that surgeons &lt;br&gt; should warn patients about the potential for dysphotopsia. They warn &lt;br&gt; about everything else, and dysphotopsia is far more frequent than any &lt;br&gt; other kind of complication. &lt;br&gt; I would also advise anyone who has been told by an eye examiner
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>kemcc</name>
  <email>kem...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-18T19:30:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/4e18d91b026be5f5/beefd8082c70fadb?show_docid=beefd8082c70fadb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/4e18d91b026be5f5/beefd8082c70fadb?show_docid=beefd8082c70fadb"/>
  <title type="text">Re: secondary cataract 4 years after</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The -1.5 vision was the expected result from the initial surgery. I &lt;br&gt; chose to be a bit myopic (which was probably a mistake). But, it was &lt;br&gt; my decision, and the result was as expected. Karen
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dr Judy</name>
  <email>mpac...@rogers.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-18T19:11:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/8d434a2716121f87?show_docid=8d434a2716121f87</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/8d434a2716121f87?show_docid=8d434a2716121f87"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Just had cataract surgery - original problem seems worse</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You are about 3 days post op!!!!!! &lt;br&gt; The eye needs to heal. Have you ever had a bruise heal in three &lt;br&gt; days? There is inflammation in the eye and you cannot expect it to be &lt;br&gt; cleared up until after you have finished with your post operative &lt;br&gt; drops, about 4-6 weeks from now. &lt;br&gt; If concerned, postpone the Dec 5 procedure. A second opinion doesn&#39;t
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>otisbr...@embarqmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-18T18:08:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/4e18d91b026be5f5/ecc5c21c4de57087?show_docid=ecc5c21c4de57087</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/4e18d91b026be5f5/ecc5c21c4de57087?show_docid=ecc5c21c4de57087"/>
  <title type="text">Re: secondary cataract 4 years after</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Dear Karen, &lt;br&gt; operation. &lt;br&gt; The ophthalmologist did a good job judging the replacement lens. &lt;br&gt; I now have 20/20 and a postive refractive STATE of +1/2 diopter. &lt;br&gt; Question: &lt;br&gt; Were you -1.5 diopters myopic after the operation, or did you &lt;br&gt; have normal visual acuity. &lt;br&gt; Did the -1.5 diopters develop over the last four years.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>roberu...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-18T13:10:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/6d3660add46302f1?show_docid=6d3660add46302f1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/6d3660add46302f1?show_docid=6d3660add46302f1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Just had cataract surgery - original problem seems worse</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks, Dr. Robins. I am in computer science. I do tend to notice &lt;br&gt; things that other&#39;s don&#39;t, but these artifacts are very noticeable. I &lt;br&gt; now know that they are relatively common and also that many people &lt;br&gt; neuroadapt to them. Your explanation of why they are not described &lt;br&gt; beforehand makes sense. On the other hand, if one expects them, there
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Robins, MD</name>
  <email>trasha...@runbox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-18T06:25:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/7c07ed5ddedb18bc?show_docid=7c07ed5ddedb18bc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/a10554aae70db7d4/7c07ed5ddedb18bc?show_docid=7c07ed5ddedb18bc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Just had cataract surgery - original problem seems worse</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On 11/17/08 3:45 PM, in article &lt;br&gt; d5ee1e66-4858-4829-9923-339c5a f56...@s9g2000prg.googlegroups .com, &lt;br&gt; You seem to probably have photosias related to the IOL. The jiggle is the &lt;br&gt; IOL vibration in the eye. The dark arc is a known, but less common, ivusal &lt;br&gt; effect, less commonly seen than a bright arc due to light reflecting
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Neil Brooks</name>
  <email>neil0...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-18T04:46:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/138e23d26a627d97/14ca25edd7ece8c1?show_docid=14ca25edd7ece8c1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.sb/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/138e23d26a627d97/14ca25edd7ece8c1?show_docid=14ca25edd7ece8c1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Developing stereopsis</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Gareth: &lt;br&gt; As a patient (not a doctor), I&#39;ll agree with Mike&#39;s remarks. &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s generally considered that /true/ infantile (or congenital) &lt;br&gt; strabismics do not develop the neurologic component necessary for true &lt;br&gt; stereo vision. &lt;br&gt; Also, you probably owe a huge debt of gratitude to our resident idiot, &lt;br&gt; Otis Brown for providing you with that link to Wikipedia.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
